To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
[quote="TaterSalad"]Linux is no saint when it comes to TPM either. They have TPM modules in the kernel source. Granted you don't have to compile it or install it but it is there.[/quote]
Enabling the use of a TPM microcontroller in itself means nothing.
I'm sure many people will read your statement as an implication of this being the same as the DRM/TPM setup in Vista, but its far from it.
If it's GPL'd, anyone can change the source to remove it, then compile it again. The spirit of the GPL isn't *against* DRM, it's against DRM you can't remove (eg., not providing the keys for modding, as in Tivoization...)
BTW unsigned drivers are actually a good thing in lots of cases. Omega drivers for ATI cards for one, and in Vista, the reasons you stated are correct, but another reason for not having unsigned drivers is so that they can't use any of the protected paths, bypassing the DRM. (means less functionality)
Edited 2007-01-25 18:15
There are a lot of improvements into Vista kernel, such as the memory managment and the stack/heap and kernel data, read these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Features_new_to_Windows_V...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_and_safety_features_new_to_Wi...
And tons of improvements into Vista architecture are outside of kernel
Edited 2007-01-26 13:40





Member since:
2006-11-24
There truly are some changes/refinements in vista.
But i still wont be using it, because i see now more than ever how Microsoft is tightening the grip on their platform using DRM+TPM.
It will have to be XP until it dies, and than GNU/Linux from there on end.
EDIT: and lets not forget their proven API lockin technique
Edited 2007-01-25 13:15