Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Jan 2007 21:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 206003
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
i doubt most of these tests though, except the history one, konquerors history is very slow, because of the way its stored (basically at every page open, it serializes all the data with a QDataStream, and then forces a sync).
and other than that, well, even if khtml is abit slower, i suppose its only fair, since it supports much more.
http://www.css3.info/selectors-test/
konqueror 3.5.6: 578/578
IE6: 276/578
firefox 2.0: 357/578
opera 9.10: 346/578






Member since:
2006-09-06
I think you misspoke yourself. Konqueror _is_ fast... It's just in second place behind Opera...
... but yes, opera is also very well suited for KDE (it's QT based)
source: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#linspeed