Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 26th Jan 2007 14:57 UTC, submitted by iangibson
PC-BSD PC-BSD 1.3 was released on New Year's Eve. Dru Lavigne interviewed Kris Moore, Andrei Kolu, and Charles Landemaine of the PC-BSD release engineering team regarding the new release and their involvement within the PC-BSD community.
Thread beginning with comment 206345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oliver
Member since:
2006-07-15

This is FUD, do use *BSD first before spreading FUD.

>FreeBSD simply does not rise to the level of Linux in hardware support.

X -> mostly the same support
Audio -> almost the same
TV -> a field of Linux, but they have some unstable drivers too in kernel
Network/Wlan -> no real difference, maybe better in OBSD

>if someone is going to produce an OS that does not work as well as others and relies on "tinkering" or "fixes" that may be fine for some folk but at least admit it and work on it.

There isn't something to admit, because it's FUD of Linux people. Sorry but you hear this rant everywhere.

Slackware was a nice distro, some years ago. Today it's just years behind, behind every OS. No default(!) package management, kernel 2.4.x is default (guess why, because of stability ;) ) and so on. Your miracle of development is just an vintage os in Linux world. But well, give me more of your FUD, it's really amusing ;)

Reply Parent Score: 4

Happel Member since:
2005-11-16

>Slackware was a nice distro, some years ago.[/italics]

Still is!

>Today it's just years behind, behind every OS. No default(!) package management, kernel 2.4.x
is default

Misinformation. Pkgtool is there and works like charm. 2.4 is default, so what? It's easy to replace with 2.6.x. You can build your own or install kernel from extra/ or testing/.

Reply Parent Score: 1

garymax Member since:
2006-01-23

"Slackware was a nice distro, some years ago. Today it's just years behind, behind every OS. No default(!) package management, kernel 2.4.x is default (guess why, because of stability ;) ) and so on. Your miracle of development is just an vintage os in Linux world. But well, give me more of your FUD, it's really amusing..."

Why is it when someone shares an opinion that's based on proveable experience it is all of a sudden "FUD"? I have nothing personally against FreeBSD other than my experience.

The savage driver is still broken, it choked on hardware that runs Linux perfectly. No FUD just facts. And Slackware is just as up-to-date as any other distro...it just gives you the control without all of the bloat and layers of abstraction.

I'll say it again: a man who has had an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument (FUD).

Reply Parent Score: 0

Doc Pain Member since:
2006-10-08

"X -> mostly the same support
Audio -> almost the same
TV -> a field of Linux, but they have some unstable drivers too in kernel
Network/Wlan -> no real difference, maybe better in OBSD"


As far as I experienced, some Linusi recognize hardware that PC-BSD doesn't, but the majority of standard components can be used with both of them. So both are nearly equivalent. If I can believe some informations I've heard, Linux does support more hardware than "Windows" does, so maybe this is true for PC-BSD, too?

Does "TV" refer to the TV out (video) of GPUs or HDTV 'n stuff? Or multimedia capabilities? I would like to get the video output of my ancient ATI RV250 Radeon 9000/9000 working. :-)

Reply Parent Score: 2

hamster Member since:
2006-10-06

"As far as I experienced, some Linusi recognize hardware that PC-BSD doesn't, but the majority of standard components can be used with both of them. So both are nearly equivalent. If I can believe some informations I've heard, Linux does support more hardware than "Windows" does, so maybe this is true for PC-BSD, too? "

Your talking about hardware support out of the boks right? Which still doesnt make sence unless you compare a linux kernel that is just as old as XP.

Reply Parent Score: 2

happycamper Member since:
2006-01-01

/*Slackware was a nice distro, some years ago. Today it's just years behind, behind every OS.
No default(!) package management, kernel 2.4.x is default (guess why, because of stability ;) ) and so on. */

but still slackware get more hits on distrowatch then pcbsd and desktopbsd. why is that?

Edited 2007-01-28 13:46

Reply Parent Score: 1

happycamper Member since:
2006-01-01

/*No default(!) package management*/


why for? netbsd's pkgsrc works great

Reply Parent Score: 1