Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jan 2007 02:12 UTC, submitted by flanque
"So, which really is better for the desktop: Vista or Linux? I've been working with Vista since its beta days, and I started using Linux in the mid-90s. There may be other people who have worked with both more than I have, but there can't be many of them. Along the way, I've formed a strong opinion: Linux is the better of the two. But, now that Vista is on the brink of becoming widely available, I thought it was time to take a comprehensive look at how the two really compare. To do this, I decided to take one machine, install both of them on it, and then see what life was like with both operating systems on a completely even playing field."
Thread beginning with comment 206502
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: his multiboot suggestion
by Sphinx on Sun 28th Jan 2007 05:55
in reply to "his multiboot suggestion"
Member since:2005-07-09
RE: his multiboot suggestion
by Moochman on Sun 28th Jan 2007 10:03
in reply to "his multiboot suggestion"
Member since:2005-07-06
RE[2]: his multiboot suggestion
by Redeeman on Sun 28th Jan 2007 13:39
in reply to "RE: his multiboot suggestion"
Member since:2006-03-23
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-03-23
seems very weird, how would that bootloader he recommends be any better than grub, just in case one wishes to boot more than two different OS's? grub does support more than linux/winblows.