Linked by Andrew Youll on Sat 20th Aug 2005 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 20652
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: GPL-only zealots everywhere
by Mark Williamson on Sat 20th Aug 2005 16:18
in reply to "GPL-only zealots everywhere"
Actually, you can combine GPL code with other licenses so long as they don't impose any *additional* restrictions over the GPL's provisions. e.g. 3 clause BSD license, MIT license (I think), public domain code, other licenses. You don't have to relicense those portions, you just distribute the *aggregate* work according to the terms of the GPL.
The new Apache license includes restrictions regarding patents that are GPL incompatible (although the FSF think these are a good idea and are talking to ASF about resolving these compatibility issues, IIRC).






Member since:
It's boring now! The GPL
- is not the only OSI-approved free OSS license
- does not allow combining code with anything else than GPL code, not even Apache or Mozilla
- does not protect OSS authors from being sued for patent infringement, which the MPL, the CDDL and some other licenses do
Learn it now: Being dedicated to OSS means being dedicated to OSS and not to GNU. GNU is not a synonyme for OSS and GNU is not allowed to claim OSS for itself.