Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jan 2007 02:12 UTC, submitted by flanque
Thread beginning with comment 206682
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-01-21
You contradict yourself. You have to chose between Qt and Gtk, you can't use both for your project, ...
Just out of curiosity, why can't a project decide to develop frontends for both large toolkits? Is it a problem with a license or is it just that you wouldn't do it and conclude from that, that others can't do it?
so there's no standard, neither Qt nor Gtk is the standard, you're free.
Actually, both QT(3 and 4) and GTK are part of a standard. I would suggest heading over to
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Specifications
and read the "Desktop" section of the current LSB 3.1 specification. The fact, that no "single" standard exists wrt to toolkits should not be mistaken with a situation, where no standard at all exists. Pretty big difference.
So, LSB compatible distributions know what versions of the QT and GTK land they should provide at least as an optional upgrade and 3rd party developers can always include the libraries in question on the installation media just in case. Everybody (well, everybody except you) happy!
Freedom in this case is not a good thing.
Well, that's your opinion.
EDIT: Fixed typos and misspellings
Edited 2007-01-28 17:23