Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 29th Jan 2007 20:10 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Hi-Mobile.net was very generous to send us over the second most high-end Nokia S40-based phone (after the 7390) for a review, the 6288. This model is an updated version over its similarly-looking 6280, and it's considered a high-end feature phone. Read more for our findings and plenty of screenshots.
Thread beginning with comment 207015
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: "Feature"
by Eugenia on Mon 29th Jan 2007 17:32 UTC in reply to ""Feature""
Eugenia
Member since:
2005-06-28

You don't understand. Anything that it's above low-end but not a smartphone, it's called "feature phone", regardless of the features it has (or not). It's a classification, not a statement to its features.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: "Feature"
by memson on Tue 30th Jan 2007 14:02 in reply to "RE: "Feature""
memson Member since:
2006-01-01

"feature phone" isn't a term I've heard used over here in the UK. We seem to get "mobile phones" and "pda phones" pretty much. You buy what you can afford.

It sounds a bit like a buzzword. Like VCR (we say "Video"), "RV" (we say "car" or "4x4"), "SUV" (we say "car", "4x4" or "School run car" :-P ), realtor (?sp?), i.e. "house seller" (we say "estate agent")

Why does the US have to make everything so complex and categorised??

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: "Feature"
by Moochman on Tue 30th Jan 2007 18:50 in reply to "RE[2]: "Feature""
Moochman Member since:
2005-07-06

Most people don't called them "feature phones". However, for the purposes of product review, it makes sense to be a bit more specific. I suspect review sites like CNet have had a lot to do with the "phone categorization scheme".

So basically, it is a buzzword. But it makes sense to use in this review...

Why do the British have to make so many generalizations about other countries' populations? ;-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2