Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Jan 2007 16:53 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Thread beginning with comment 207491
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Let's see if they get it
by smitty on Tue 30th Jan 2007 22:25
in reply to "RE[4]: Let's see if they get it"
What documents? I agree with you in principle, but in practice these hardware vendors have to be so quick to market that there isn't usually ANY natural language documentation.
The programmers in the company that wrote the Windows driver almost certainly had some kind of documentation - it's unlikely they wanted a hardware engineer on the phone with those guys practically 24/7. It may be incomplete or outdated, but it would at least be a good starting point.






Member since:
2005-07-08
What documents? I agree with you in principle, but in practice these hardware vendors have to be so quick to market that there isn't usually ANY natural language documentation.
As Linus has said many times, the source code is the only valid documentation. Any print documentation is inherently out-of-date and/or inaccurate--at least in the commodity space.
That's why many hardware vendors will choose the part of the offer where they supply an engineer's email address. "Well, I don't know how that register works, but I do know that we set it to 0xFFFFFFFF in our Windows driver."
Edited 2007-01-30 22:03