Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Jan 2007 16:56 UTC, submitted by teigetje
Thread beginning with comment 207529
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-30
At the moment, we do not know the full nature of the licence, so we'll need to wait and see, however, Castle have said that basically, if someone makes money out of RISC OS, they'll want a licence fee. So I guess that means if you use the commerical RISC OS emulator, then they'll get some money, if you use one of the free ones, they likely will not get any money. But then, they were not getting any money out of that anyway.
As far as I know, there will be no legal barrier to making RISC OS 5 run on the RiscPC, or any other ARM hardware, and by extension, ARM hardware emulators.