Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Jan 2007 21:34 UTC, submitted by Flatline
Thread beginning with comment 207737
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-03-12
"I gotta disagree with that, when a distro updates after install, it's downloading all sorts of fixes, not just new functionality or security updates, they are for all sorts of issues, and if you think otherwise, you are living in a dream.
No software is perfect, especially Vista, but to look at Linux with rose coloured glasses is just not healthy."
Eh?
The issue with Vista is that you are either of the opinion that Vista...is ready...or its not.
Its quite clearly that the launch was rushed. The only think you can say is should Microsoft had waited *longer* to launch, or is Vista *good enough* now.
This is very different from Linux where a release happens every 3 Months and *only* critical patches done as an incremental release.
If you are talking about a distribution you are *not* talking about the *OS* you are talking thousands of programs. A distribution evolves. It is not released periodically say every *5 Years*.
Edited 2007-01-31 16:56