Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Feb 2007 14:41 UTC, submitted by Oliver
Thread beginning with comment 208040
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: license incompatiablity
by Oliver on Thu 1st Feb 2007 16:15
in reply to "RE[2]: license incompatiablity"
RE[4]: license incompatiablity
by FooBarWidget on Thu 1st Feb 2007 16:22
in reply to "RE[3]: license incompatiablity"
Uhm... no? I quote butters:
"Probably by using the (unfortunately not so well known) fact that NO free software license places restrictions on how you USE the code (as opposed to distributing the code). Rest assured that you are free to link code licensed under incompatible licenses to your heart's content as long as you don't distribute the linked binary."
According to butters, the license of the kernel module doesn't matter, as long as you don't distribute the linked binary. And that's exactly what NVidia is doing: they're not distributing linked binary kernel modules.





Member since:
2005-11-11
"Regardless, if you download the sources and build the modules yourself, there is no grey area. This is perfectly legal and, in fact, a right protected by all OSI-approved licenses."
Is that so? The NVidia driver works exactly like this - you download their installer and the installer compiles the kernel module on that machine. Yet lots and lots of people say that this is illegal.