Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Feb 2007 14:41 UTC, submitted by Oliver
FreeBSD "Linux has a large amount of device drivers for hardware not supported on FreeBSD, especially USB devices. Not rarely, such drivers have been written based on information derived by protocol sniffing, reverse engineering and the like. This makes the code highly undocumented, and renders the porting effort extremely error prone. To help with this task, I decided to start working on an emulation layer that would let us recompile the linux source code on FreeBSD, and provide a sufficiently complete emulation of the kernel APIs so that device drivers (or at least certain classes) could be used without modifications to their source code."
Thread beginning with comment 208134
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Miss-information
by hamster on Thu 1st Feb 2007 21:37 UTC in reply to "Miss-information"
hamster
Member since:
2006-10-06

"Second , this one single webpage ( not even a site or project ) , is reversing reality by saying that somehow the driver paid and made by GNU/Linux developer and the GNU/Linux community should support FreeBSD. Cooperate with FreeBSD yes , work for them for free and no support whatsoever NO !!! "

If anyone should know anything about reversing reality it should be you... Who's asking for free work?

"Fourth the documentation is also available so does the source code except its all GPL. Witch I doubt the illegal derivative they are trying to make from GPL code are going to be. "

Illegal? Do you even know what your talking about here or are you just ranting as usual?

"Fifth why emulate when you can just add the missing code to FreeBSD just as long as it stay GPL. Its not like the rest of BSD is not GPL based anyway ... KDE , GNOME , XFREE , X.org , etc ... "

Ohh i see your just on your usual ranting again. Talking about things you clearly have no idea about.

You might wanna take a look at this from the xfree site...

"Code submitted under the restrictions of the GPL are not acceptable and will be refused "

and from the x.org site...

"The X Window System is distributed under the MIT ("X") License by the X.Org Foundation LLC."

And xfree, x.org, KDE and grome isnt a really big part of any bsd.

"Finally making anything BSD is a waste of time and money as shown by everything BSD ( in the last four decades ) who was closed and is now being used under other licenses inside Microsoft Windows OS and Apple MAC OS X . It does not sustain nor support itself and end up lagging behind its own derivative. "

Well we allready established that you don't know what your talking about... no need to show more.

"Its just another sad attempt at slandering and libel of GNU/Linux by BSD. They don't want it working or any cooperation , they want to slander and libel only. "

Funny thing is i see more of that from the linux side... You should try to read your own posts.

"Otherwise they would have made a proper project website ( use sourceforge for example + some wiki ), they would have asked all BSD for funding and cooperation and instead of Mud slinging they would have asked for cooperation and help from GNU/Linux. "

Ohh you talk about the same kind of help openbsd got from all the linux distroes that uses openssh..?

"Its just usual BSD garbage that leads them nowhere."

If you changed bsd with mine and them with me you'd be right on the money... The same old bs you allways come up with.

Reply Parent Score: 3

v RE[2]: Miss-information
by Moulinneuf on Fri 2nd Feb 2007 00:11 in reply to "RE: Miss-information"