Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Feb 2007 16:43 UTC, submitted by mwtomlinson
Thread beginning with comment 209082
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-12
"There are pragmatic people and idiologists"
Wrong argument wrong place. There are arguments around Linus' pragmatic view when it comes to binary blobs in the kernel...or using bitkeeper.
You could even argue that using GPL2 for the kernel instead of GPL to allow *possible* wider adoption of the Linux kernel is pragmatic.
How and why? does pragmatic apply.
The only think pragmatic here is the move from GPL3...so this Novell nonsense will not happen again.
Currently there is *nothing* wrong with what Novell has done, and thats a problem for Novell users in a few years and other Linux users now.
Your comment is more bizarre when I *Samba* quite a well know product for interoperability is going GPL3.