Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 4th Feb 2007 20:36 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 209102
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Great for CSS. Go for Javascript
by tsuraan on Sun 4th Feb 2007 23:50
in reply to "Great for CSS. Go for Javascript"
I definitely can't argue about konq lacking in the JavaScript department, but I actually really like the gmail pure-html implementation. If it weren't for the annoying banner at the top telling me to use a better browser, I'd have no complaints about it at all. It's a really nice web page, IMHO.
RE[2]: Great for CSS. Go for Javascript
by getaceres on Mon 5th Feb 2007 07:59
in reply to "RE: Great for CSS. Go for Javascript"
RE[2]: Great for CSS. Go for Javascript
by superstoned on Mon 5th Feb 2007 14:42
in reply to "RE: Great for CSS. Go for Javascript"







Member since:
2005-07-06
I've always liked Konqueror and it's great to be the first in supporting CSS correctly but I don't use it normally because it's extremely slow when using GMail and Google News and also some Web 2.0 sites doesn't render correctly. I hope the next step is to optimize the Javascript machine.