Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Feb 2007 22:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 210452
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe
by umccullough on Thu 8th Feb 2007 05:59
in reply to "BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe"
RE[2]: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe
by spikeb on Thu 8th Feb 2007 11:10
in reply to "RE: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe"
RE: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe
by Jack Burton on Thu 8th Feb 2007 08:57
in reply to "BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe"
RE[2]: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe
by mikesum32 on Thu 8th Feb 2007 10:16
in reply to "RE: BlueEyedOS and Cosmoe"
Not to argue without reason, but started has many different meanings.
07/01/2001: The BlueOS project is born.
08/05/2001: FAQ has been updated
08/22/2001: mailing list opened and member section updated
You opened your mailing list on August 22, 2001
Okay, but now look at this.
[openbeos] Ok, let's start
* From: "Marcus Overhagen" <dos4gw@xxxxxx>
* To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
* Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:47:33 -0700
OpenBeOS opened their mailing list on the exact same day !
It seems to me you started at the same time.
Edited 2007-02-08 10:24








Member since:
2005-10-22
As far as I understand it, BlueEyedOS came about mostly because the folks in charge didn't like the technical and licensing decisions that Haiku made.
Cosmoe is a different story. Bill is using the Linux kernel but Haiku's app server and other pieces. He contributed a good amount of fixes back to Haiku. I suspect that he will have to report his changes to both the Haiku (if he wants) and Linux kernels, making it a bigger and bigger job as time goes on.
That's the way it was told to me by Big Red himself.