Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 8th Feb 2007 22:07 UTC, submitted by Floris Lambrechts
Privacy, Security, Encryption More than one million devices have already shipped with LinuxBIOS, and the growth is continuing. In his interview for the upcoming FOSDEM 2007 conference, LinuxBIOS creator Ronald Minnich talks about vendor support, the One Laptop Per Child BIOS, and his reluctance towards EFI.
Thread beginning with comment 210709
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS
by Oliver on Thu 8th Feb 2007 23:16 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS"
Oliver
Member since:
2006-07-15

Comparing apples with oranges is usus nowadays I guess?

>And people with a sane one would go compile their own kernels, for example?

But this is to some extent true too, nobody in BSD would do it without need for example ;)
But the nonsense begins, if you're seeing a need in overclocking your hardware. Some people call this an error in reasoning.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS
by Dima on Thu 8th Feb 2007 23:46 in reply to "RE[3]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS"
Dima Member since:
2006-04-06

But the nonsense begins, if you're seeing a need in overclocking your hardware.

A few years ago, I bought a motherboard with an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ processor. But, it would not run at 2GHz by default. At the store, employees made it very clear that I would need to change the clock speed from 100 to 133 - and even the box with the CPU mentioned the number 133.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS
by helf on Fri 9th Feb 2007 00:17 in reply to "RE[4]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS"
helf Member since:
2005-07-06

That's because an AMD 2000+ CPU does *not* run at 2GHz. The 2000+ rating means its comparable to an Intel CPU running at 2GHz. A pretty pointless rating system actually.

Unless I'm horribly mistaken on this, in which case, correct me.

Edited 2007-02-09 00:17

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[4]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS
by brewin on Thu 8th Feb 2007 23:51 in reply to "RE[3]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS"
brewin Member since:
2005-06-30

"Some people call this an error in reasoning."
Some people call it getting your money's worth.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS
by r_a_trip on Fri 9th Feb 2007 16:35 in reply to "RE[4]: EFI vs LinuxBIOS"
r_a_trip Member since:
2005-07-06

Some people call it getting your money's worth.

I'd call it being desperate to eek out the last drop of performance, in the vain hopes of running your slow Windows a little faster.

Since I went the GNU/Linux route full time back in 2001, I have never overclocked a machine from that time on. Most hardware is fast enough when being managed by a well written system.

Realization: Not everybody runs Windows, but I can't imagine the advantage of risking system damage if a non-MS system runs very well at factory defaults.

Edited 2007-02-09 16:40

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2