Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Feb 2007 22:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 211171
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Was there a public beta?
by Matt24 on Sat 10th Feb 2007 12:45
in reply to "RE: Was there a public beta?"
RE[3]: Was there a public beta?
by gelosilente on Sun 11th Feb 2007 08:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Was there a public beta?"
10.4 still a beta?
by s_groening on Sat 10th Feb 2007 15:57
in reply to "RE: Was there a public beta?"
...no more so than, say Linux 2.6.0 or Windows Vista...
Remember, please, there'll be bugs found in every piece of software, so if this is what you're picking at, you might take time to elaborate on your exact experiences than bashing 'Tiger' in general as it'd add to your credibility.
RE[2]: Was there a public beta?
by hurricanechristian on Sat 10th Feb 2007 17:36
in reply to "RE: Was there a public beta?"






Member since:
2006-08-13
I tink the same, plus I have to say that 10.4 tiger is still a beta....