Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 21st Aug 2005 14:36 UTC, submitted by AlexZOP
OSNews, Generic OSes "Based on an operating system called GEOS that was popular in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Breadbox Ensemble is a small (a full installation weighs in at under 10 MB) and fast suite of incredibly useful programs. While small, Breadbox Ensemble has a graphical user interface that mimics the look and feel of the Windows desktop." Read more...
Thread beginning with comment 21158
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: You're missing the point ...
by edwdig on Mon 22nd Aug 2005 03:07 UTC in reply to "RE: You're missing the point ..."
Member since:

Either you have a short memory, or you haven't used a 486. I had no problems running Win95 on an 486 SX2 66 (yes, SX, not DX). It had 8MB RAM and 420MB harddrive (with a separate compressed partition to press more applications into).

I had no problems with speed. Word 95 and IE3 were responsive and the only problem I had was that Office/Windows took a lot of my HD space.

You're not very discrimative about calling things responsive if you think Win95 on a 486 with 8 MB of RAM is responsive.

Back in the day, I had a 286 w/1 MB running GEOS 1.2. I then got a Pentium 75 w/8 MB and Win 3.11. I set P75 up next to the 286, and was excited I could finally run Windows. That excitement lasted about 5 minutes before I realized that Windows on the Pentium was slower than GEOS on the 286.

GEOS 2.0 on the 286 was a bit slower, but was still ran faster than Win95 on the P75. I don't remember how GEOS 2.0 on the 286 vs Win3.1 on the P75 went, but I think they were roughly equal in speed. Win95 on the P75 was just horrible to use.

For the record, I don't consider Win95 usable without at least a 166mhz machine and 32MB of ram.

Reply Parent Score: 2