To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RedHat/Fedora based distros, too.
BTW, I thought FHS was part of LSB now?
At any rate, I'm glad to hear about it. Some distros putting things in /opt while others put them in /usr is exactly the sort of silly, purposeless, incompatibility that is bad for Linux, and with no upside.
Though to be honest, I must admit that I did not know that Suse had been doing this.
You are somewhat incorrect. The FHS preceded the LSB, but the LSB includes the FHS as-is. Proof is in the pudding:
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Co...
Please make better informed comments to improve the quality of OSNEWS. However, you are correct that it is FHS compliant to put desktop environments under /usr like virtually every distro sans SUSE has been doing for years now.







Member since:
2005-07-06
LSB has nothing to do with directories. If you're thinking of the FHS, it's rather more FHS-compliant to put the DEs in /usr. This is what we (Mandriva) and Debian do at least, I'm not sure about Ubuntu and FC.