Linked by John Doe on Thu 15th Feb 2007 17:56 UTC
Windows Shock and awe; Windows Vista has been released to the hounds (that would be us). As just about every publication has reiterated a thousand times over it took 5+ years of design and development and cost USD 5.5 billion both directly and indirectly. We were promised (maybe not even promised, but bullshitted) a revolutionary operating system and what we got is for you to determine for yourselves. I personally think it's a disappointment to say the least.
Thread beginning with comment 213251
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Gates quote
by yakirz on Thu 15th Feb 2007 23:05 UTC in reply to "RE: Gates quote"
yakirz
Member since:
2006-05-11

Oh yeah, I think Windows addiction is a real danger in our society *rolls eyes 360 degrees*

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Gates quote
by dylansmrjones on Thu 15th Feb 2007 23:38 in reply to "RE[2]: Gates quote"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Actually it is. Windows piracy is as bad as Microsoft getting children hooked on Windows and MS Office by giving it away freely or cheaply to educational centres.

This way the children learns nothing but obeying Microsoft. Very smart and very unethical (and there fore very Microsoftish).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Gates quote
by yakirz on Fri 16th Feb 2007 01:04 in reply to "RE[3]: Gates quote"
yakirz Member since:
2006-05-11

Addiction is a sad story, but this type of addiction is disgusting ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Gates quote
by StephenBeDoper on Fri 16th Feb 2007 17:15 in reply to "RE[3]: Gates quote"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

Actually it is.

Oh please. How is Windows addiction (whatever that is) a "real danger" - especially when compared to additions that are harmful in quantifiable ways?

Windows piracy is as bad as Microsoft getting children hooked on Windows and MS Office by giving it away freely or cheaply to educational centres.

Your contention is that "practice N is bad, because it's just as bad as practice N"? Isn't that basically a texbook example of a sophist argument?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2