Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sat 17th Feb 2007 03:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 213780
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: They just seem to get it
by anda_skoa on Sat 17th Feb 2007 15:24
in reply to "RE[2]: They just seem to get it"
So, GNOME is likely to use Telepathy directly
While it might be possible that they are going to implement the whole Telepathy specification themselves, I think it is more plausible that they will also use an existing implementation, maybe even Tapioca (the one used by Decibel)
RE[3]: They just seem to get it
by napf on Sat 17th Feb 2007 20:55
in reply to "RE[2]: They just seem to get it"
That is not correct.
The language bindings for telepathy that is recommended to KDE developers are actually those provided by Tapioca.
The telepathy website mentions a Mission Control component. It is not really clear what that is supposed to do and there is only a incomplete draft of it yet, but that is close to some of the things Decibel does.
Decibel is not a language binding, it is a service layer on top of telepathy.






Member since:
2006-12-24
For the record, Decibel is built on top of the Telepathy framework, a freedesktop.org framework written largely by GNOME developers. So, GNOME is likely to use Telepathy directly or with a GLib wrapper, whereas KDE will use Telepathy by wrapping it in a KDE friendly API through Decibel.
Both desktops are featuring integration. The main difference right now is that KDE is advertising it much more right now.