Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Feb 2007 18:45 UTC, submitted by GhePeU
X11, Window Managers David Reveman writes: "I'd like to get all of you updated on the compiz related things discussed at the X developer conference that was held last week. My talk was mainly focused on 'what's next' and how to get desktop compositing in X to the next level." He also discussed the fork: "I had the chance to talk to Quinn Storm from the beryl project during xdevconf. I would have hoped that the current situation with beryl could be improved but it seems like Quinn at least isn't interested in that. However, after talking to Quinn it's very clear to me that the fork was partially motivated by assumptions that were wrong."
Thread beginning with comment 214036
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I remember..
by Buffalo Soldier on Sun 18th Feb 2007 04:17 UTC in reply to "I remember.."
Buffalo Soldier
Member since:

I started my AIGLX experience with Beryl and I was amazed by what it can do on my 855GM integrated Intel graphic card.

But a few months ago I tried Compiz and I think I prefer it over Beryl. Reasons?
- it "seems" smoother and faster,
- sane default settings,
- sane default plugins, and
- less crashes.

Anway that's just my personal opinion and preferences. But I think the stability over blingbling trade-off that David chooses is starting to show off, especially in the lower end Intel integrated graphic cards.

Machine - Ubuntu 6.10 on Inspiron 510m
Reference -

Reply Parent Score: 5