Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Feb 2007 21:00 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 214254
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The worst is the threats are vague
by Mellin on Mon 19th Feb 2007 00:38
in reply to "RE: The worst is the threats are vague"
RE[3]: The worst is the threats are vague
by Windows Sucks on Mon 19th Feb 2007 02:10
in reply to "RE[2]: The worst is the threats are vague"
RE[2]: The worst is the threats are vague
by ma_d on Mon 19th Feb 2007 03:50
in reply to "RE: The worst is the threats are vague"
Why would they sue big vendors? They'll sue customers, customers of other vendors...
They're not http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darl_McBride stupid. Suing big players means going to court, which means setting precedence, which means law.
RE[3]: The worst is the threats are vague
by phoehne on Mon 19th Feb 2007 05:00
in reply to "RE[2]: The worst is the threats are vague"





Member since:
2005-11-10
They can put the rest any Samba claims because they do not own license to SMB, IBM does.
Microsoft is not gonna use patents directly against anyone unless they can show that someone blatently used them. They know that if they sued Novell, or Apple (Which uses Samba and other open source tools) or anyone else they would draw too much attention from governments.
So they scare everyone! And like SCO tried to do, they make people PAY.