Linked by Jeremy LaCroix on Mon 22nd Aug 2005 18:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 21528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I actually think that the Ubuntu installer is elegant - simple, fast and effective. It suits its purpose well, and with Breezy the second stage install will be unified with a similar progress bar.
On performance, Ubuntu does the job extremely well. My computer is really fast, even with the equipped i686 kernel.
I agree. Ubuntu's installer does its job well. there are definitely parts that could use better documentation for newbies (partitioning for those who choose to leave the defaults is probably one, though I don't really remember clearly at this point)
I do hope that the Ubuntu people *don't* follow this reviewer's advice regarding installers - Anaconda is a horrible installer - way too inflexible and crash-prone.




Member since:
Reviews, reviews everywhere nor anytime to... use?