Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Feb 2007 22:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 215466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: What Microsoft has done.
by CPUGuy on Thu 22nd Feb 2007 14:36
in reply to "RE[2]: What Microsoft has done."
RE[4]: What Microsoft has done.
by anda_skoa on Thu 22nd Feb 2007 17:05
in reply to "RE[3]: What Microsoft has done."







Member since:
2005-07-07
They ask for so many things because so many apps are designed so poorly that these apps ARE accessing system files, or protected parts of the registry, etc...
Absolutely true, however the correct way to deal with this is not to ask every time a violation occurs but just to deny the access.
If a broken application can just keep on being broken, why should a vendor change it?
Better let some applications be recognized as broken instead of rendering the operating system's security systems meaningless.