Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Feb 2007 22:01 UTC
Windows "Microsoft has gone out on a limb to promote Vista not merely as 'the most secure version of Windows ever' (every recent version is marketed with that tired slogan), but for the first time as an adequately secure version of Windows. 'We've got the message and we've done our homework', the company says. So let's see if the reality lives up to the marketing hype."
Thread beginning with comment 215466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What Microsoft has done.
by anda_skoa on Thu 22nd Feb 2007 12:20 UTC in reply to "RE: What Microsoft has done."
anda_skoa
Member since:
2005-07-07

They ask for so many things because so many apps are designed so poorly that these apps ARE accessing system files, or protected parts of the registry, etc...

Absolutely true, however the correct way to deal with this is not to ask every time a violation occurs but just to deny the access.

If a broken application can just keep on being broken, why should a vendor change it?

Better let some applications be recognized as broken instead of rendering the operating system's security systems meaningless.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Perhaps because you can't break compatibility with 90% of your applications?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

anda_skoa Member since:
2005-07-07

Perhaps because you can't break compatibility with 90% of your applications?

You are saying that 90% of Windows applications are broken and couldn't be fixed within seven years?

Good grief!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2