Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Feb 2007 22:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 215467
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: The problem with critics...
by aGNUstic on Thu 22nd Feb 2007 13:05
in reply to "RE[3]: The problem with critics..."
"My files are far more important than the O/S itself. I perhaps do not care much if my machine is turned into a spam relay station."
'Allowing someone to take control of your machines does not only hurt you, it hurts everybody shared infrastructure with you.'
How many people `actually know` how to secure thier machines? Seriously. I've met McSoft WinCode users who thought the monitor was the computer. I rarely find that with people who run BSD, Linux or OS X.
Like cars or weapons, people should be trained to use a computer. This is beyond the push the power buttons, move the mouse or use a keyboard. This training should include at a very minimum ... securing a computer.
Edited 2007-02-22 13:10






Member since:
2005-07-07
My files are far more important than the O/S itself. I perhaps do not care much if my machine is turned into a spam relay station
Unfortunately that is a common and dangerous attitude shared by a lot of users.
Allowing someone to take control of your machines does not only hurt you, it hurts everybody shared infrastructure with you.
Fortunately a couple of countries are starting to make people accountable for damage caused by their equipment if they don't handle it properly and deactivating security systems is quite unlikely considered appropriate.
I pitty all those who will be scapegoats the moment a distributed attach causes real damage and when the mob starts to demand blood.