Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Feb 2007 16:12 UTC, submitted by KugelKurt
Boudewijn Rempt writes about the KDE image manipulation program Krita. He writes about Flake support and various features regarding image rendering quality like a new fast scaler. Zack Rusin writes about the ongoing effort to port WebKit to Qt4 for possible inclusion in KDE 4. A new issue of the KDE Commit-Digest has also been released, telling us about various topics like NetworkManager support in KDE 4 or the installment of techbase.kde.org. In addition, this document [.pdf] presents what has been accomplished in the Nepomuk-KDE project so far.
Thread beginning with comment 216682
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-06-29
There are 400 feature requests, most of which have not been addressed for years.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=GIMP&bug_status=NEW&b...
Member since:2005-09-21
400 feature requests? Dear lord! Such terrible news. Let's look at KDE.
http://bugs.kde.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi
Oh my! Over 12 THOUSAND feature requests! I can only recoil with horror at the mere thought of how limiting KDE must be.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-09-22
Krita is as limited as GIMP. I personally feel more comfortable with Krita's GUI than with the GIMP's, because it makes more sense to me, but both of them are terribly limited. Remember that the GIMP doesn't support bold text if you don't have the specific bold TTF file.
Besides that comment on TTF, what makes GIMP so terribly limited? I'm no graphic artist, but I'd like to know anyway.
On the other hand, Krita does have CMYK support, wich you won't find in GIMP. And yes, I also find Krita's UI more friendly.