Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Feb 2007 16:12 UTC, submitted by KugelKurt
KDE Boudewijn Rempt writes about the KDE image manipulation program Krita. He writes about Flake support and various features regarding image rendering quality like a new fast scaler. Zack Rusin writes about the ongoing effort to port WebKit to Qt4 for possible inclusion in KDE 4. A new issue of the KDE Commit-Digest has also been released, telling us about various topics like NetworkManager support in KDE 4 or the installment of techbase.kde.org. In addition, this document [.pdf] presents what has been accomplished in the Nepomuk-KDE project so far.
Thread beginning with comment 216755
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Krita vs. Gimp
by abraxas on Mon 26th Feb 2007 23:34 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Krita vs. Gimp"
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

What I'm looking for personally is something that I can be happy with for such things and a good solid replacement for dreamweaver. Thus far I haven't really found anything that I like.

I've found a collection of tools that to me are much better than dreamweaver. I use bluefish together with firefox with the webdeveloper extension, the view source chart extension, the edit css extension, the firebug extension, and the html validator extension. I don't even use firefox as my main browser but you can almost develop websites with it alone.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: Krita vs. Gimp
by systyrant on Tue 27th Feb 2007 17:03 in reply to "RE[3]: Krita vs. Gimp"
systyrant Member since:
2007-01-18

I've tried bluefish and Quanta. I didn't like either. I liked nVu, but it crashed constantly and now they are moving development back into seamonkey.

My biggest problem is that most of these web editors have crappy CSS support. If I wanted to remember every CSS and HTML tag I would use something like notepad and a browser. What I like about dreamweaver is that is has a very nice CSS editor that can work with linked CSS docs and not just inline styles.

To put it simply I want something very similar to dreamweaver on Linux, but better.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Krita vs. Gimp
by abraxas on Wed 28th Feb 2007 18:04 in reply to "RE[4]: Krita vs. Gimp"
abraxas Member since:
2005-07-07

My biggest problem is that most of these web editors have crappy CSS support. If I wanted to remember every CSS and HTML tag I would use something like notepad and a browser. What I like about dreamweaver is that is has a very nice CSS editor that can work with linked CSS docs and not just inline styles.

Hmm. That's interesting. I don't use inline styles at all. I only use linked CSS and I haven't had a problem developing with bluefish and firefox. Of course I am a hand coder so I guess it depends on your style of development. It isn't very difficult to develop linked CSS with bluefish though. Just open another tab with your CSS file and use the CSS editor on that document.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2