To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Very well said. In addition to this and my argument below (Congrats to Sun for missing the point), it's worth clarifying that the GPLv3 is almost completely ineffective when combined with the CDDL. The latter is nearly always more permissive than the GPLv3, so the more restrictive parts of it can be legally side-stepped on the grounds that the CDDL grants a license to do what the GPLv3 prohibits. Essentially:
CDDL + GPLv3 == CDDL + under-informed fanboys
Dual licensing isn't a combination of licensing. It is the process of distributing something under two different licenses. If you only want to abide by the GPL you are free to. SUN will not accept the changes into their tree but they don't have to. It no longer belongs to Sun. It belongs to everyone.





Member since:
2005-07-08
Very well said. In addition to this and my argument below (Congrats to Sun for missing the point), it's worth clarifying that the GPLv3 is almost completely ineffective when combined with the CDDL. The latter is nearly always more permissive than the GPLv3, so the more restrictive parts of it can be legally side-stepped on the grounds that the CDDL grants a license to do what the GPLv3 prohibits. Essentially:
CDDL + GPLv3 == CDDL + under-informed fanboys