Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Mar 2007 21:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 218243
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-14
> But man is this thing heavy. I just don't get it. And no, it's not Beagle. It's not Kerry. Neither one do I have running. Even when I leave my computer on for several days. I've seen Suse on other computers. It's just slow by comparison.
What exactly do you mean with heavy?
When I compare openSUSE with (K)Ubuntu I must say that the responsiveness of KDE and Gnome is much better on openSUSE! I tried it on Aspire 1353 and Thinkpad Z61m.
Start time of applications varies: some start faster under openSUSE other start faster under (K)Ubuntu.
The only thing which is slower, is boot time under openSUSE compared with (K)Ubuntu. But this equalizes a little bit if you enable all system processes under (K)Ubuntu like preload, sth. comparable to AppArmor, a firewall like Guarddog etc.
After doing that boot time difference wasn't that much any more.
All in all I cannot confirm that openSUSE is heavy or slow in any means.
And memory consumption is not worse compared with other Linux distributions if you enable Beagle and all that stuff there...