Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 4th Mar 2007 22:10 UTC, submitted by martini
Thread beginning with comment 218551
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-17
IBM, from what I remember, cannot open source the product because Microsoft owns a large chunk of the code. OS/2 was a joint project between the two at one time.
Due to this, IBM has to still pay licensing fees to the usual third parties, esp. Microsoft. IBM has to pass the charges through to Serenity Systems. Serenity also has to pay their developers.
Remember how long it took to open source Solaris? That was because the SCO Group owned a chunk of the code in there, and that had to get cleaned up before it was released. You'll also never see HP/UX open sourced because Symantec/Veritas owns a chunk of the file system code.
There are still many applications which run on OS/2 which people are more than willing to pay money for. There are people still using DOS and XENIX. OS/2 is going to be around for a while in some apps.
IBM has open sourced a lot of ancillary technologies which OS/2 uses (JFS, etc.). However, the base OS is still encumbered by patents from other sources, namely MS.
This product meets its customers' needs, and they are more than willing to pay for it.