Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Mar 2007 15:40 UTC, submitted by editingwhiz
Thread beginning with comment 219085
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: They turned it around?
by tmanop2006 on Tue 6th Mar 2007 19:56
in reply to "They turned it around?"
RE: They turned it around?
by echo.ranger on Tue 6th Mar 2007 19:59
in reply to "They turned it around?"
Because they were bored and noticed it hadn't changed much in the last 20 years?
Truthfully, they claim its to reduce energy consumption. Some statistic I read stated it is supposed to reduce the US dependency on 150,000 barrels of oil throughout the year. The worst part is there is a footnote in the bill that gives Congress the option to reverse the change in the next year or two if the gain doesn't prove worthy.
I wonder how much of that "gain" is now lost with all the IT departments that have to spend time updating DST files on servers.
RE[2]: They turned it around?
by tmanop2006 on Tue 6th Mar 2007 20:07
in reply to "RE: They turned it around?"





Member since:
2006-02-06
Well, I'm not from U.S. But I do wonder: Why exactly did they change it? Environmental/energy issues? Biological/health reasons? Something other reason?
Just curious.