To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Aaaah... Scribus is very mature actually. It's a bit cumbersome in the beginning until you get the hang of the interface, but the same is true for Gimp.
Scribus is however a completely different type of application (DTP) and Gimp is a bitmap image editor.
As a DTP-application Scribus is really good. And light years ahead of MS Publisher - especially in regard to usage of open standards. I use Scribus to create magazines for printing. Print to pdf (specification 1.4) - remember to embed the fonts - and send the file to a printing service. Digital printing is fine for small quantities - if large quantities go with offset printing.
Aaaah... Scribus is very mature actually. It's a bit cumbersome in the beginning until you get the hang of the interface, but the same is true for Gimp.
Scribus is however a completely different type of application (DTP) and Gimp is a bitmap image editor.
Yes, I know, please re-read my original post.
Basically, what I'm saying is that Gimp is more mature as a Photoshop replacement than Scribus is as a InDesign replacement. Not much more, but a little bit (it's been around longer).
As a DTP-application Scribus is really good. And light years ahead of MS Publisher
Yes, I agree - although it's not that hard to be better than that abomination called Publisher...




Member since:
2005-07-02
Yes, notice how I said that other OSS alternatives were not as mature as Gimp...Inkscape and Scribus are very good, but don't compare to Gimp in terms of maturity.
I hadn't heard about Xara Extreme...thanks for the link, that looks *very* promising (though it's not a bitmap graphic editor like Gimp/PS, it could be a worthy competitor to Illustrator).