To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Then your argument makes no sense. Open-source applications are not, by default, cross-platform. Therefore the fact that an app is open-source does not mean that it has to compile on Linux, or on Windows.
Your comment was:
As it stands right now, Linux support and functionality is a subset of Windows support and functionality. And as long as the Linux community continues to use an open-source development model and as long as there exists even one Windows user with a C++ compiler, that is the way it will stay.
The 'open-source development model' does not preclude linux-only applications. Also, the presence of open-source applications do not preclude closed-source applications on Linux. Proprietary software can be compiled and run on Linux legally.
The 'open-source development model' does not preclude linux-only applications. Also, the presence of open-source applications do not preclude closed-source applications on Linux. Proprietary software can be compiled and run on Linux legally.
Prove it. Name me even one piece of closed-source software that only runs on Linux. A 'hello world' program that you wrote and compiled just to prove this point doesn't count.
Edited 2007-03-08 15:50





Member since:
2007-02-22
Well, no... by open-source, I meant open-source.