To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think the assumptions is based on the fact that .NET will be available on all Windows platforms, and .NET framework will eventually be the framework of choice for Windows applications.
The assumption is rather optimistic given how long it took for the original win16 to win32 migration - add to that, what are the benefits; if they want multi-platform, there is Java - so how can Microsoft justify re-writes of applications (or atleast partial) given the next to no tangiable improvement.
I think the assumptions is based on the fact that .NET will be available on all Windows platforms, and .NET framework will eventually be the framework of choice for Windows applications.
Yeah, that's why .NET is/will be the platform for the vast majority of windows programming.
The assumption is rather optimistic given how long it took for the original win16 to win32 migration
It wasn't that long. Everybody wanted to get away from win16 as soon as possible.
add to that, what are the benefits; if they want multi-platform, there is Java
Most windows developers don't care about multiplatform.
so how can Microsoft justify re-writes of applications (or atleast partial) given the next to no tangiable improvement
They don't re-write unless there is a good enough benefit. Visual Studio is a perfect example. Gradually, parts of it are rewritten in managed code.




Member since:
2005-11-14
Almost every application we use at work is written in Java, either Swing or SWT. And these are third party applications not just things we write here... in fact I don't think we use a single application written in .NET... and this is a huge government contract with multiple venders... so what is this about Java having lost the battle for the Windows desktop???