Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Mar 2007 17:38 UTC, submitted by sogabe
Thread beginning with comment 220509
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: But... Haiku isn't ready for this.
by thjayo on Mon 12th Mar 2007 18:45
in reply to "But... Haiku isn't ready for this."
RE[2]: But... Haiku isn't ready for this.
by umccullough on Mon 12th Mar 2007 19:24
in reply to "RE: But... Haiku isn't ready for this."
Well, duh - Haiku comes with GNU software (hello: bash!)
But anyway, that doesn't mean it has to be named GNU/Haiku - that's really quite annoying as there's no requirement that it do so. (last I checked, the GPL didn't require that the use of GNU software be specified in the product name).
I'm a little disappointed in this "first distro" - I think it's slightly in bad taste, but I'll reserve my judgment as this is really just my opinion.
RE: But... Haiku isn't ready for this.
by computrius on Tue 13th Mar 2007 20:51
in reply to "But... Haiku isn't ready for this."
RE[2]: But... Haiku isn't ready for this.
by deb2006 on Tue 13th Mar 2007 21:34
in reply to "RE: But... Haiku isn't ready for this."







Member since:
2005-07-11
Haiku hasn't left Alpha stage yet. It's still in development. I don't think it's developers think it's ready to be a 1.0 release.
And I didn't know that Richard Stallman had anything to do with Haiku. How can they call it GNU/Haiku?
They are putting out new builds every day. This thing is already using obsolete code.