To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
..Hmm, interesting
-----------------
Date: 2007-03-04 20:36:59 GMT
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:17:03PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> Yep, I agree. Thanks everyone for being tolerant of >my confusion and disruption while I look for a way to >remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev.
Stop it. You don't like him, fine. I personally don't like you, no problem. And many people hate me, good too.
Please go back to your hacking and improve Gentoo. You just can't 'remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev', live with it, or leave Gentoo if you don't like the way we do things now.
- ferdy
------------------
Date: 2007-03-04 20:44:28 GMT
That's actually a very good idea. I definitely don't want to be associated with this project.
-Daniel
-----------------
It would seem to me that drobbins as fallen victim to the script-kiddie developers that Gentoo nurtured over time. What seemed like a a valid attempt to bring focus and scope to disruptive bantering between separate projects backfired when faced with flame throwing immature personalities. I think trying to ban the guy might have been misplaced effort with what might have been good intent but as I said before what you have is developers who may not have the experience or understanding that maintaining and establishing a separation of concerns[1] is something to be sought after.
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns






Member since:
2007-03-12
> > "Strong personal attacks by some of the current developers of the project."
"
> ^
> That's not fair...
Actually, it was a quarrel with Ciaran McCreesh, ex-developer, that resulted in Daniel Robbins' resignation. Ciaran is considered by some current developers as a trollish person.
I was an active Gentoo user and proponent for ~3 years, but eventually I moved (back) to Debian and Ubuntu some months ago. Still, this stream of events really saddened me.
The thread that started all this can be found here:
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339
Look at this too:
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339/focus=46404
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339/focus=46467
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339/focus=46482
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339/focus=46496
And finally:
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46489
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46491
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46495
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46498
Plus, another developer has left for the same reasons:
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46500
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46478/focus=46503
Summing up:
"300 messages, two developers, and 17 cups of coffee later..
* http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46339/focus=46555