Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 16th Mar 2007 17:02 UTC, submitted by Shawna McAlearney
Privacy, Security, Encryption "Starting today, I plan on posting a monthly vulnerability scorecard for common server and workstation Operating System products. I'm going to keep these scorecards pretty clean of discussion, but you can review my methodology, sources and assumptions." Note that these results speak only of fixed vulnerabilities; the author aims to include information on non-fixed problems and the time it takes to fix problems as well. You should also read this, by the way.
Thread beginning with comment 222037
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Let us wait
by CrazyDude0 on Fri 16th Mar 2007 21:22 UTC
CrazyDude0
Member since:
2005-07-10

and see how hundreds of OSS a$$holes prove the articles wrong.

Now change the article contents and interchange XP with Ubuntu and see how same OSS a$$holes prove the article right:)

Reply Score: -4

RE: Let us wait
by sbergman27 on Fri 16th Mar 2007 21:50 in reply to "Let us wait"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Dude,

I hope you don't mind me calling you "Dude", but that *is* the "Real name" that you supply in your user profile.

Why show up with guns blazing like this?

Read over the links. Read the posts.

Come to your own conclusions.

But such a confrontational style, and repeated use of the term "a$$hole", does not improve your credibility any more than it would help an OSS advocate who used that style and nomenclature.

I'm an OSS advocate. If you happen to be a Microsoft advocate, then you would do best to *advocate*, and not sabotage your own position by name calling and being generally confrontational without prior provocation.

Edited 2007-03-16 22:00

Reply Parent Score: 2

v RE[2]: Let us wait
by CrazyDude0 on Sat 17th Mar 2007 00:07 in reply to "RE: Let us wait"