Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 17th Mar 2007 00:26 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu During my 8 years of Linux on and off usage I have tried more distros than I have chocolate bars. Each one of my previous encounters meant that I had to spend at least 2 days configuring before I have a desktop that I was somewhat comfortable with. With Ubuntu Feisty Fawn's latest test beta --for the first time ever-- this was not the case. I was up and running with all the niceties I wanted within 2 hours.
Thread beginning with comment 222260
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Photoshop
by Kokopelli on Sat 17th Mar 2007 15:47 UTC
Kokopelli
Member since:
2005-07-06

I am not a graphics guy. For my extremely limited needs Gimp works just fine. So I really do not know the advantages/disadvantages of various graphics programs... That said, has any one tried this:

http://www.xaraxtreme.org/

I do not remember where I got the link, but it looks interesting. From a graphics professional standpoint I would say that Photoshop skills are needed simply from a resume standpoint if nothing else. I wonder if this might be a usable replacement for photoshop for non-professional power users though.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Photoshop
by ngaio on Sat 17th Mar 2007 17:43 in reply to "Photoshop"
ngaio Member since:
2005-10-06

"I am not a graphics guy. . . . From a graphics professional standpoint I would say that Photoshop skills are needed simply from a resume standpoint if nothing else."

Indeed, you are not a "graphics guy" if you make a statement like this. Take one attribute of photo enhancement -- sharpening. Sometimes it's very useful to sharpen in the lab channel, especially if you don't want the blemishes on a person's face to appear worse than they really are. The Gimp does not yet have that mode. Photoshop does. This is a small but important example of why a program like Photoshop is useful for photographers and why unfortunately the Gimp is not yet sufficient.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Photoshop
by Kokopelli on Sat 17th Mar 2007 18:18 in reply to "RE: Photoshop"
Kokopelli Member since:
2005-07-06

Thank you for the reply and the pointers... Though no thanks for the attitude. I apologize for asking a polite question and retract the attempt at education.

EDIT: I meant that even if there were a suitable substitute, which I have on multiple occasions said there is not, from a professionals standpoint the need to know Photoshop is important. But don't bother with polite recourse, it might actually prove useful to someone.

Edited 2007-03-17 18:26

Reply Parent Score: 2