To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thank you for the reply and the pointers... Though no thanks for the attitude. I apologize for asking a polite question and retract the attempt at education.
EDIT: I meant that even if there were a suitable substitute, which I have on multiple occasions said there is not, from a professionals standpoint the need to know Photoshop is important. But don't bother with polite recourse, it might actually prove useful to someone.
Edited 2007-03-17 18:26
Kokopelli, if you want to ask a question about Photoshop or any other program outside your acknowledged areas of expertise then go ahead and ask. But if you make a sweeping generalization that indicates people who master it do so mainly for their resume / CV, then expect to be corrected.
Personally, I hope one day GNU Linux has a software system that caters for all the needs of serious photographers--it is getting there, just as it is in so many other fields. I am sure you feel the same way, so let us leave it at that.





Member since:
2005-10-06
"I am not a graphics guy. . . . From a graphics professional standpoint I would say that Photoshop skills are needed simply from a resume standpoint if nothing else."
Indeed, you are not a "graphics guy" if you make a statement like this. Take one attribute of photo enhancement -- sharpening. Sometimes it's very useful to sharpen in the lab channel, especially if you don't want the blemishes on a person's face to appear worse than they really are. The Gimp does not yet have that mode. Photoshop does. This is a small but important example of why a program like Photoshop is useful for photographers and why unfortunately the Gimp is not yet sufficient.