Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Mar 2007 22:16 UTC
Almost two years ago, the FSF started work on the first update of the GNU GPL in over a decade. A last-minute hitch, though, is keeping the license from appearing. According to Peter Brown, the FSF's executive director, "We continue to work on the details of the GPLv3 as it relates to the situation presented by the Novell and Microsoft deal. We are researching issues related to potential unintended consequences of the language we plan to adopt. As soon as we are satisfied with the results of our research we plan to bring forward the next draft."
Thread beginning with comment 223181
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: It takes a long time
by davyc on Thu 22nd Mar 2007 13:41
in reply to "RE[6]: It takes a long time"
Member since:2006-07-20
RE[8]: It takes a long time
by twenex on Thu 22nd Mar 2007 15:24
in reply to "RE[7]: It takes a long time"
Member since:2006-04-21
Ho hum, poor analogy. If I run MS Windows I don't need an MS computer or an MS program to run on it.
Hmm, well considering that most computers are supplied by default with MS Windows, I'd say that pretty much qualifies as an "MS computer". Not to mention the fact that Microsoft has its own document standards, makes sure that most PC manufacturers preload its own software onto most computers, and makes sure others don't have access to (e.g.) its exchange protocols.
Member since:
2006-04-21
And what if you're happy writing propriety software and earning a buck from something you wrote? You imply that this is wrong, that the person is evil. Jeez.
Most free software proponents "imply" nothing other than they will simply refuse to fund proprietary software makers.
So Ford are evil for making cars and not giving you the details of their engineering or engine management software, TV makers likewise, Smoothie makers, the whole world is bad for selling you propriety goods.
Since when did you need a Ford driving test and Ford petrol to drive a Ford car? Or a Smoothie glass to drink a Smoothie from? THAT is why proprietary software is a REALLY. BAD. IDEA for everyone concerned. Except for the producers of course.
And before you jump down my neck wondering why a good thing for the producer is a bad thing for everyone else, it isn't: Ford provide cars, which people need. So each of the parties get something out of it. Without free software only the proprietor gets something out of it.