Star Clearing up 'Anti-GPL3 FUD'
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Mar 2007 17:49 UTC, submitted by anonymous
GNU, GPL, Open Source Bruce Perens writes: "There's been a lot of talk about GPL version 3: whether it goes too far to be acceptable to business, whether the Linux kernel developers will ever switch to it, whether our community will fork or undergo unrest over it. Much of that talk is based on a poor understanding of the GPL3 terms, and with release of the new license imminent, it's time to clear that up."
E-mail Print r 1   51 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/djd
Thread beginning with comment 224068
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's not FUD
by codehead78 on Fri 23rd Mar 2007 19:47 UTC
codehead78
Member since:
2006-08-04

the FSF just can't take real criticism.

Reply Bookmark Score: 2

RE: It's not FUD
by borker on Fri 23rd Mar 2007 19:50 in reply to "It's not FUD"
borker Member since:
2006-04-04

as indicated by what?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: It's not FUD
by Gryzor on Fri 23rd Mar 2007 21:16 in reply to "RE: It's not FUD"
Gryzor Member since:
2005-07-03

as indicated by what?

History my friend, history.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: It's not FUD
by elsewhere on Sat 24th Mar 2007 03:08 in reply to "It's not FUD"
elsewhere Member since:
2005-07-13

the FSF just can't take real criticism.


The problem isn't with the FSF team, it's with their cheerleaders.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3