Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Mar 2007 22:07 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Microsoft Software behemoth Microsoft could be one of the biggest losers from proposed license changes to the Linux operating system unveiled Wednesday. That's a possible outcome of updates to the license pushed by the FSF. The FSF wants to make mutually exclusive pacts such as the Novell-Microsoft open-source agreement a violation of the next iteration of the GNU GPL, the license that governs Linux use. "It is unfortunate that the FSF is attempting to use the GPLv3 to prevent future collaboration among industry leaders to benefit customers," said Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft's vice president of intellectual property and licensing.
Thread beginning with comment 225784
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE
by alisonken1 on Fri 30th Mar 2007 00:18 UTC in reply to "RE"
alisonken1
Member since:
2006-03-20

completely doing away with patents isnt the answer either. if i develope and app (or god forbid an OS) I want to have the right to charge for it, licence it, and if others use the technology i have developed i belive it fair to collect revenue if thats how I want to market my product.


Your oversimplifying.

Patents are good for inventions (which may be a little debatable), but when talking software, patents are the wrong venue.

Software is not an "invention". Software is an "idea".

Ideas are copyright material - not patent material.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5