Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Apr 2007 15:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 226878
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's about supply and demand. A lot of muso's are still in the dark about FLAC, yet WAV is well known among musicians, DJs and producers. Which creates a demand for WAV - so from that point, it's more profitable to offer uncompressed files (albeit at a higher price) than to educate people about other codecs and how to use them.
Personally i'm not bothered about dealing with uncompressed files - HDD space costs nothing these days and internet speeds are fast enough to download the files in, not more than, a few minutes.





Member since:
2005-11-16
Completely uncompressed audio? That seems completely pointless and more than a little crazy.
I can't see why either the site or the downloaders would want to waste their bandwidth, not when lossless compression offers exactly the same files at roughly half the size.