Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Apr 2007 15:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 226991
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-11-16
I'd have thought that a club full of 2000 people would be just about the last place where virtually nonexistent differences in sound quality would be perceptible...
Actually they don't know exactly what they're getting if they don't know the the source used for the WAV files. I know of commercial audio CDs that were mastered from low bitrate compressed files, and I've known people transcode files to higher bitrates thinking that it'll somehow improve the quality. With a lossless format like FLAC you're getting exactly the same content as the source WAV that was compressed, so it isn't really any different.
Of course they can decompress the FLAC files back into WAV if they need to play them on a device that doesn't support the format. Just putting up the WAVs seems as silly as hosting large applications that aren't compressed.
I suppose I'm making a big deal about nothing, after all the consumers of these files obviously aren't bothered, but the pointlessness and wastefulness of it just bugs me.