Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Apr 2007 21:11 UTC, submitted by judgen
Thread beginning with comment 227043
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-26
I'm familiar with the current development tools on OSX, which are largely derived from NEXT, but I'm not familiar with NEXT circa 1996. The other systems I recall at the time for 32 bit OS development were something like NT 3.5.1 with Microsoft PowerStation C/C++ and Fortran. (Yes, Microsoft sold a Fortran compiler, although I don't know if they wrote it.) DOS with PharLap's 32 bit extender (a non-starter for most people). Of course there was Windows 95, but your development options were Microsoft C++ 2.0 or some rubbish like that. Compared to other tools I used on Unix (i.e. Sun Studio at the time), VisualAge was very cool. I would put it on par with what IB offers me today, especially with the Controllers pallette.