Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Apr 2007 22:39 UTC, submitted by El-Al
Thread beginning with comment 227197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: two sides to every coin
by sogabe on Wed 4th Apr 2007 06:32
in reply to "RE: two sides to every coin"






Member since:
2005-10-09
ACCESS owns the rights to BeOS. This is non-debatable. What other "side" of the coin do you need? The side of somebody who never made a written statement through any of his companies that he had rights to the source? Wow, some people never give up in their blind defense.
I'm just curious how you think anything Bernd could have to say would make this situation any different. Unless you think ACCESS is wrong in their interpretation of their own license?