Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Apr 2007 13:14 UTC, submitted by detonator
"I, Michael Buesch, am one of the maintainers of the GPL'd Linux
wireless LAN driver for the Broadcom chip (bcm43xx). The Copyright holders of bcm43xx (which includes me) want to talk to you, OpenBSD bcw developers, about possible GPL license and therefore copyright violations in your bcw driver. We believe that you might have directly copied code out of bcm43xx (licensed under GPL v2), without our explicit permission, into bcw (licensed under BSD license)." The entire thread can be found here.
Thread beginning with comment 228132
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
It is not your place to enforce your beliefs on the whole world. Whether the GPL is morally applicable to drivers is not the issue here.
Oh, but it's ok for Stallman to use the GPL to enforce his beliefs about patents on the world with the GPLv3?
It is a two-way "street."
Member since:2006-06-03
Member since:2005-07-06
Oh, but it's ok for Stallman to use the GPL to enforce his beliefs about patents on the world with the GPLv3?
No one is forcing developers to license their code under the GPL. Developers who CHOOSE to use the GPL for their code know exactly what they are doing. They use the GPL because they agree with spirit of the license.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-06-03
It is not your place to enforce your beliefs on the whole world. Whether the GPL is morally applicable to drivers is not the issue here.