To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The question is is Bernd really responsible for any legal things now or relys the responsibility in the hands of yt (insolvency administrator) ?
Bernd Korz seems to be the one who "owns" the "rights" and "source". YellowTab was just a shell company for getting finance, employees, and customers. In that case, I get the feeling that Bernd Korz does have personal liability. Indeed, I'm wondering if the administrator of YellowTab could seek damages from Bernd Korz for fraud. In the absense of any proof that Bernd Korz has a legitimate agreement and source code from the owners of the BeOS this seems reasonable.
> The question is is Bernd really responsible for any
> legal things now or relys the responsibility in the
> hands of yt (insolvency administrator) ?
As CEO, he was ultimately responsible for whatever may have happened under his tenure. That an insolvency manager was assigned when the company went into bankruptcy protection does not change that a bit.




Member since:
2007-04-08
> No one has asked to post a verbatim copy of a possible license agreement to his web site, but at least he should have had the guts to tell ZETA's buyers and users something like "I can assure you that ZETA is perfectly legal". As long as he does not deliver even this minimal response, there is little reason not to believe the position of Acess.
The question is is Bernd really responsible for any legal things now or relys the responsibility in the hands of yt (insolvency administrator) ?