Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Apr 2007 20:58 UTC, submitted by rx182
Thread beginning with comment 228926
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: There will be a XP SP3
by edogawaconan on Tue 10th Apr 2007 12:29
in reply to "RE[2]: There will be a XP SP3"




Member since:
2007-01-12
If one was running NT4 SP6 and happened to reinstall NT4 with no service packs, the performance difference was incredible. The minimum (official Microsoft, i.e. memory, CPU) requirements for the OS actually grew during the SP process. The same holds for Windows 2000 SP0 vs SP4. Obviously you didn't notice the gradual performance slide installing SP1-SP4, you probably "added memory, faster processor, etc." to compensate. I realized I was throwing away a machine (512M, Pentium I) that had actually been "fast" when Win2K was first installed on it and seemed like a dog with Win 2K SP3, XP, etc.
An install of Win 3.1 on current hardware takes less than 20 _seconds_, to give you some idea how bloated Windows has become.